Management of damage by elk (Cervus elaphus) in North America: a review
Author(s) -
W. David Walter,
Michael J. Lavelle,
Justin W. Fischer,
Therese L. Johnson,
Scott E. Hygnstrom,
Kurt C. VerCauteren
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
wildlife research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.81
H-Index - 68
eISSN - 1448-5494
pISSN - 1035-3712
DOI - 10.1071/wr10021
Subject(s) - wildlife , wildlife management , population , wildlife conservation , geography , environmental resource management , stakeholder , public land , human–wildlife conflict , environmental planning , ecology , agroforestry , biology , environmental health , medicine , environmental science , public relations , political science
Abundant populations of elk (Cervus elaphus) are cherished game in many regions of the world and also cause considerablehuman-wildlifeconflictsthroughdepredationonagricultureandspecialitycrops,lackofregenerationtonative ecosystems,collisionswithvehiclesandtransmissionofdiseasebetweenfree-rangingandfarmedhoofstock.Managementof elk varies, depending on current and historical agency objectives, configuration of the landscapes elk occupy, public perception, population density and behaviour of elk. Selection of the method to manage elk often requires knowledge of timing of impacts, duration relief from elk damage is desired, cost-effectiveness of management activities, tolerance of impacts, public perception of management strategies and motivation or habituation of elk to determine the likelihood of success for a proposed management action. We reviewed methods that are available to control abundant populations of elkthatincludelethal(e.g.hunting,sharpshooting)andnon-lethal(e.g.fertilitycontrol,frightening)options.Wepromotean integrated approach that incorporates the timely use of a variety of cost-effective methods to reduce impacts to tolerable levels.Lethaloptionsthatincluderegulatedhunting,sharpshootingandaerialgunningvarybylikelihoodofsuccess,duration neededforpopulationreduction,costtoimplementreductionandpublicperceptions.Severalnon-lethaloptionsareavailable to affect population dynamics directly (e.g. fertility control, translocation), protect resources from damage (e.g. fences, repellents) or influence space use of elk on a regular basis (e.g. harassment, frightening, herding dogs, humans). Public perceptionshouldbeconsideredbyagenciesthatarelookingforfeasiblemethodstocontrolpopulationsofelk.Disturbance to residents or visitors of public property may influence methods of management employed. Future research should explore thedurationofharassmentneededtoavertelkfromsensitiveareasandcoststoimplementsuchprograms.Severalmethodsin ourreviewwereimplementedondeerandadditionalresearchonelkandothercervidsinconflictwithhumaninterestswould provide a much needed component to our understanding of management methods available for ungulate species.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom