z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Is Pigmentation Important for Face Recognition? Evidence from Contrast Negation
Author(s) -
Richard Russell,
Pawan Sinha,
Irving Biederman,
M. Nederhouser
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
perception
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.619
H-Index - 91
eISSN - 1468-4233
pISSN - 0301-0066
DOI - 10.1068/p5490
Subject(s) - negation , contrast (vision) , face (sociological concept) , identity (music) , set (abstract data type) , psychology , face perception , representation (politics) , matching (statistics) , perception , cognitive psychology , artificial intelligence , communication , pattern recognition (psychology) , mathematics , computer science , neuroscience , linguistics , art , aesthetics , philosophy , statistics , politics , political science , law , programming language
It is extraordinarily difficult to recognize a face in an image with negated contrast, as in a photographic negative. The variation among faces can be partitioned into two general sources: (a) shape and (b) surface reflectance, here termed 'pigmentation'. To determine whether negation differentially affects the processing of shape or pigmentation, we made two sets of faces where the individual faces differed only in shape in one set and only in pigmentation in the other. Surprisingly, matching performance was significantly impaired by contrast negation only when the faces varied in pigmentation. This provides evidence that the perception of pigmentation, not shape, is selectively disrupted by negation and, by extension, that pigmentation contributes to the neural representation of face identity.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom