Response to Comments on ‘‘Alfvén ‘resonance’ reconsidered: Exact equations for wave propagation across a cold inhomogeneous plasma’’ [Phys. Plasmas 1, 3523 (1994)]
Author(s) -
Paul M. Bellan
Publication year - 1995
Publication title -
physics of plasmas
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.75
H-Index - 160
eISSN - 1089-7674
pISSN - 1070-664X
DOI - 10.1063/1.871140
Subject(s) - physics , plasma , argument (complex analysis) , magnetohydrodynamics , resonance (particle physics) , neutrality , compressibility , quantum electrodynamics , classical mechanics , quantum mechanics , mechanics , philosophy , epistemology , biochemistry , chemistry
We agree with both Goedbloed and Lifschitz (whom we will refer to as GL) and Ruderman, Goossens and Zhelyazkov (RGZ) that the apparent violation of quasi‐neutrality in Ref. is not a true problem and rescind this particular argument against MHD. However, the rest of the discussion in our paper is independent of this argument regarding quasi‐neutrality, and as discussed below, the conclusions in Ref. about the validity of MHD, about compressibility versus incompressibility, and about Alfven resonance remain valid.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom