English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Author(s): Oosterbaan, Katherine J; White, Alec F; Head-Gordon, Martin | Abstract: © 2018 American Institute of Physics Inc.. All rights reserved. In our recent publication,1 we incorrectly stated some of the CIS and TDDFT k-edge excitations. Specifically the errors were in the CIS k-edge for all molecules except C2N2 and C2H6 and the TDDFT k-edge for only C2H2, N2, CO2 O, F2, and C2H2, all of which are shown in Table II of the original paper. A corrected version of that table can be found below. This changes our results slightly in that the RMSEs of the CIS and the TDDFT results are slightly reduced, but it does not change the primary conclusion that NOCIS is a promising method for calculating core excitations though it lacks dynamical correlation. (Table Presented).

journal of chemical physics online/the journal of chemical physics/journal of chemical physics

Erratum: “Non-orthogonal configuration interaction with single substitutions for the calculation of core-excited states” [J. Chem. Phys. 149, 044116 (2018)]