English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The Comment proposes that the discrepancy between two second harmonic scattering (SHS) experiments for DO electrolyte solutions with 100 ns and 190 fs laser pulses is due to unexplained processes for 100 ns pulses that give non-quadratic power dependence for the second harmonic signal. However, the different power dependence of the second harmonic scattering signals measured with 100 ns and 190 fs laser pulses is due to changes in laser beam propagation and focal intensity caused by the combined effect of thermal defocusing and Kerr lens self-focusing. Non-quadratic power dependence does not explain the discrepancy in the second harmonic scattering results.

Response to “Comment on ‘Water-water correlations in electrolyte solutions probed by hyper-Rayleigh scattering’” [J. Chem. Phys. 149, 167101 (2018)]