English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Original article: The Journal of Chemical Physics 145 (7), 074117 (2016) In the abstract and on page 2, right column, first paragraph, of Ref. 1, the value m=±1/(270 nm) of the spontaneous curvature m was erroneously assigned to spherical hard-core particles with a diameter of 1 nm but applies instead to such particles with a radius of 1 nm. Furthermore, in Table I of Ref. 1, the numerical values of the spontaneous curvature m for the hard-core system are obtained from Eq. (19) for variable particle radius Rhc as well as for constant bending rigidity κ=20kBT (instead of κ=10−19 J) and constant membrane thickness ℓhw=4 nm. Glucose molecules have a hydrodynamic radius of 0.36 nm at room temperature.2 Using the particle radius Rhc=0.36 nm and the previously mentioned membrane parameters, Eq. (19) predicts the spontaneous curvatures m=±1/(846 nm) and m=±1/(423 nm) when the two sides of the membrane are exposed to aqueous glucose solutions with a concentration difference of 100 mM and 200 mM, respectively

Erratum: “Membrane curvature generated by asymmetric depletion layers of ions, small molecules, and nanoparticles” [J. Chem. Phys. 145, 074117 (2016)]