English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The potential energy surface provided in the supplementary material of Ref. 1 is a different fit to that used to calculate the virial coefficient data, although they are consistent within their uncertainties and there is no scientific reason to prefer one over the other. Modified versions of Tables I and II are given here for consistency, using the fit in the supplementary material. The notation is the same as in the original work. Changes in the figures are insignificant, and the conclusions are unaffected. We thank David Kofke and Andrew Schultz for helping to resolve this discrepancy, and Ian Bell for assistance in producing the revised Table I.

Erratum: “Intermolecular potential energy surface and second virial coefficients for the water–CO2 dimer” [J. Chem. Phys. 134, 134309 (2011)]