English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This work presents a comparative study between two approaches to calibrate radar rainfall in real time. The weather radar provides continuous measurements in real-time which have errors of either meteorological or instrumental nature. Locally, gauge measurements have a greater performance than radar measurements that can be used to improve radar estimates. One way of doing that is via a state space representation associated to the Kalman filter algorithm. In the single- site modeling approach we use the linear calibration model applied in [1] and [3] while the multivariate state-space model proposed in [6] is used in the multiple site approach. This work aims to discuss and compare these two different state space formulations based on the same data set

A comparison between single site modeling and multiple site modeling approaches using Kalman filtering