Response to “Comment on ‘Quantum Monte Carlo study of the dipole moment of CO’ ” [J. Chem. Phys. 112, 4419 (2000)]
Author(s) -
Friedemann Schautz,
HeinzJürgen Flad
Publication year - 2000
Publication title -
the journal of chemical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.071
H-Index - 357
eISSN - 1089-7690
pISSN - 0021-9606
DOI - 10.1063/1.480997
Subject(s) - eigenfunction , quantum monte carlo , physics , monte carlo method , moment (physics) , feynman diagram , term (time) , mathematical physics , quantum mechanics , mathematics , eigenvalues and eigenvectors , statistics
In our previous publication we have mistakenly claimed that the applicabilityof the Hellmann-Feynman theorem in fixed-node quantum Monte Carlo calculationsis not subject to the manner how the nodal boundary depends on an externalparameter. This statement is not correct in general, except where theHellmann-Feynman force is calculated for a nodal boundary which coincides withthat of the unconstrained exact eigenfunction. We point out the error in ourarguments and present an explicit expression for the correction term whichsupplements the Hellmann-Feynman force. This term can be interpreted as thelinear response of the energy with respect to variations of the the nodalregion.Comment: 2 page
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom