English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

The relativistic Dirac Hamiltonian that describes the motion of electrons in a magnetic field contains only paramagnetic terms (i.e., terms linear in the vector potential A) while the corresponding nonrelativistic Schrodinger Hamiltonian also contains diamagnetic terms (i.e., those from an A2 operator). We demonstrate that all diamagnetic terms relativistically arise from second-order perturbation theory and that they correspond to a “redressing” of the electrons by the magnetic field. If the nonrelativistic limit is taken with a fixed no-pair Hamiltonian (no redressing), the diamagnetic term is missing. The Schrodinger equation is normally obtained by taking the nonrelativistic limit of the Dirac one-electron equation, we show why nonrelativistic use of the A2 operator is also correct in the many-electron case. In nonrelativistic approaches, diamagnetic terms are usually considered in first-order perturbation theory because they can be evaluated as an expectation value over the ground state wave function...

On the origin and contribution of the diamagnetic term in four-component relativistic calculations of magnetic properties