English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

y After publication of our paper, 1 we have discovered a programming error in the computer code for obtaining mi mum energy structures as presented in Sec. II B. Neither MD simulation scheme nor the qualitative conclusions p sented previously are affected by this but there are quan tive differences as described below. Figure 1 shows the energies of the lowest minimum ergy structures, expressed as energy divided by the num of solvent particles~replacing Fig. 1 in the original paper, 1

journal of chemical physics online/the journal of chemical physics/journal of chemical physics

Erratum: “On nonadiabatic molecular dynamics simulations of the photofragmentation and geminate recombination dynamics in size-selected I2−⋅Arn cluster ions” [J. Chem. Phys. <b>106</b>, 7102 (1997)]

Erratum: “On nonadiabatic molecular dynamics simulations of the photofragmentation and geminate recombination dynamics in size-selected I2−⋅Arn cluster ions” [J. Chem. Phys. 106, 7102 (1997)]