English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

A rebuttal is given to a criticism of an approximate method for the determination of the distribution of energy barrier heights in liquids and proteins. It is argued that the one‐dimensional counterexample used in the critique violates clearly stated assumptions in the derivation, which also appear to hold in nature. The method is shown to be accurate in a more appropriate one‐dimensional test.

Response to ‘‘Comment on a proposed method for finding barrier height distributions’’ [J. Chem. Phys. 103, 1235 (1995)]