z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Can We Assess Efficiency and Innovation in Transfer?
Author(s) -
N. Sanjay Rebello,
Mel Sabella,
Charles Henderson,
Chandralekha Singh
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
aip conference proceedings
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Conference proceedings
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.177
H-Index - 75
eISSN - 1551-7616
pISSN - 0094-243X
DOI - 10.1063/1.3266726
Subject(s) - perspective (graphical) , computer science , knowledge management , meaning (existential) , face (sociological concept) , focus (optics) , measure (data warehouse) , knowledge transfer , data science , artificial intelligence , psychology , sociology , social science , physics , database , optics , psychotherapist
Schwartz, Bransford and Sears (1) propose a two-dimensional framework that describes transfer in terms of efficiency and innovation. Efficiency is the ability to apply prior knowledge to new situations quickly and accurately. Innovation is the ability to question assumptions, let go of prior knowledge and generate new ideas. Schwartz et. al. argue that most educational assessments focus on efficiency at the expense of innovation. We suggest that this perspective does not adequately reflect the challenges that our students face while problem solving. For instance, while faculty may find end-of-chapter physics problems to be routine and overly focused on efficiency, our students, who lack prior knowledge and experience may find these problems to be novel and innovative. We propose a framework based on an operational meaning of 'efficiency' and 'innovation' and development of criteria to measure these constructs in ways that reflect both learners' challenges as well as educators' expectations.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom