English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

about 2.5% or 1.4 ms. Furthermore, we found a phase difference in the basis sets used to implement the rotational Hamiltonian of Eq. 2 and the lambda-doubling Hamiltonian of Eqs. 8–10. Finally, we found an inconsistency in the implementation of the spin-orbit Hamiltonian. The equations in the paper are consistent. In the new calculations we also replace the re = 1.8342a0 value by a more recent value 3 of re = 1.8324a0. The new calculations affect the numbers in Tables IV and V, which are reproduced here in Tables I and II. Our electric dipole moment function yields slightly higher values for the expectation values of the dipole moment than experimentally observed. Therefore, in Table II, we also include a lifetime based on our dipole moment function scaled with a factor of 0.9966. This is the average ratio between the experimentally observed v =0,1,2 dipole moment and our ab initio values. Finally, we make available a new EPAPS document 4 based on the corrected calculations. The line strengths are computed using the partition function QT = 296 = 80.362 from the HITRAN database. The changes reported here do not significantly alter our conclusions.

Erratum: “Theoretical transition probabilities for the OH Meinel system” [J. Chem. Phys. 126, 114314 (2007)]