z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Supersonic molecular beam studies of dissociative adsorption of H2 on Ru(0001)
Author(s) -
Irene M. N. Groot,
Hirokazu Ueta,
Maria J. T. C. van der Niet,
Aart W. Kleyn,
Ludo B. F. Juurlink
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
the journal of chemical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.071
H-Index - 357
eISSN - 1089-7690
pISSN - 0021-9606
DOI - 10.1063/1.2813413
Subject(s) - reactivity (psychology) , adsorption , kinetic energy , molecular beam , chemistry , ruthenium , supersonic speed , reaction rate constant , atomic physics , chemical physics , computational chemistry , thermodynamics , molecule , kinetics , physics , catalysis , quantum mechanics , organic chemistry , medicine , alternative medicine , pathology
We examined reactivity of H(2) on Ru(0001) using molecular beam techniques and we compared our results to experimental results for similar systems. The dissociative adsorption of H(2) on Ru(0001) is similar to that on Pt(111) and Ni(111), although on ruthenium nonactivated adsorption is strongly suggested. However, we find no clear signature of a steering- or precursor-based mechanism that favors nonactivated reaction paths at low kinetic energy. In comparison to Pd(111) and Rh(111) our results indicate that a universal mechanism enhancing reactivity at low energy does not have a mass dependence. In addition, we have compared our results to predictions of reactivity for H(2) on Ru(0001) from six-dimensional dynamical calculations using two different generalized gradient approximation functionals. It leads us to conclude that the PW91 functional yields a more accurate value for the minimum energy path but does not impose enough corrugation in the potential. The revised-Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof (RPBE) functional appears to behave slightly better at higher energies, but we find significant quantitative disagreement. We show that the difference is not due to different energy resolutions between experiment and theory. However, it may be due to a dependence of the reactivity on rotational state or on omission of relevant dimensions in the theoretical description.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom