Reply to “Comment on ‘Quasisaddles as relevant points of the potential energy surface in the dynamics of supercooled liquids’ ” [J. Chem. Phys. 118, 5263 (2002)]
Author(s) -
L. Angelani,
Roberto Di Leonardo,
G. Ruocco,
Antonio Scala,
Francesco Sciortino
Publication year - 2003
Publication title -
the journal of chemical physics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1089-7690
pISSN - 0021-9606
DOI - 10.1063/1.1553755
Subject(s) - supercooling , interpretation (philosophy) , curvature , statement (logic) , physics , surface (topology) , order (exchange) , theoretical physics , energy (signal processing) , statistical physics , dynamics (music) , mathematical physics , thermodynamics , mathematics , quantum mechanics , geometry , philosophy , epistemology , linguistics , finance , acoustics , economics
We reply to the Comment on the paper “Quasisaddles as relevant points of the potential energy surface in the dynamics of supercooled liquids” [J. Chem. Phys. 116, 10297 (2002)]. While we agree with J. P. K. Doye and D. J. Wales on their improved enumeration of zero curvature directions at quasisaddle points, we criticize their statement that this has important implications for the interpretation of our results. Indeed, we show here that the temperature dependence of the order of quasisaddles and true saddles are numerically coincident, providing a strong support to our previous interpretation.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom