Interpreting the Right to Bear Arms — Gun Regulation and Constitutional Law
Author(s) -
Mark Tushnet
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
new england journal of medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 19.889
H-Index - 1030
eISSN - 1533-4406
pISSN - 0028-4793
DOI - 10.1056/nejmp0801601
Subject(s) - supreme court , law , mandate , constitution , gun control , constitutional right , political science , supreme court decisions , medicine
In D.C. v. Heller, the question before the Court is whether the District's prohibition of further registration of handguns, its ban on the carrying of concealed guns, and its mandate that guns kept in homes remain unloaded and either locked or disassembled violate citizens' rights that are guaranteed by the Second Amendment. Mark Tushnet writes that the Supreme Court's upcoming decision dramatizes the tension between public policy and the Constitution. David Hemenway discusses gun violence in the United States and the likely effects of the Supreme Court case D.C. v. Heller. He is a professor of health policy at the Harvard School of Public Health, Boston.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom