z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Copy-Number Variation and False Positive Prenatal Aneuploidy Screening Results
Author(s) -
Matthew W. Snyder,
LaVone E. Simmons,
Jacob O. Kitzman,
Bradley P. Coe,
Jessica M. Henson,
Riza M. Daza,
Evan E. Eichler,
Jay Shendure,
Hilary S. Gammill
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
new england journal of medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 19.889
H-Index - 1030
eISSN - 1533-4406
pISSN - 0028-4793
DOI - 10.1056/nejmoa1408408
Subject(s) - aneuploidy , medicine , copy number variation , cell free fetal dna , prenatal screening , incidence (geometry) , prenatal diagnosis , population , down syndrome , obstetrics , chromosome , pregnancy , genetics , fetus , genome , biology , gene , environmental health , physics , psychiatry , optics
Investigations of noninvasive prenatal screening for aneuploidy by analysis of circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) have shown high sensitivity and specificity in both high-risk and low-risk cohorts. However, the overall low incidence of aneuploidy limits the positive predictive value of these tests. Currently, the causes of false positive results are poorly understood. We investigated four pregnancies with discordant prenatal test results and found in two cases that maternal duplications on chromosome 18 were the likely cause of the discordant results. Modeling based on population-level copy-number variation supports the possibility that some false positive results of noninvasive prenatal screening may be attributable to large maternal copy-number variants. (Funded by the National Institutes of Health and others.).

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom