Ultrasonography versus Computed Tomography for Suspected Nephrolithiasis
Author(s) -
Rebecca SmithBindman,
Chandra Aubin,
John Bailitz,
Rimon Bengiamin,
Carlos A. Camargo,
Jill Corbo,
Anthony J. Dean,
Ruth B. Goldstein,
Richard T. Griffey,
Gregory D. Jay,
Tarina L. Kang,
Dana R Kriesel,
Oommen John,
Michael Mallin,
William Manson,
Joy Melnikow,
Diana L. Miglioretti,
Sara K. Miller,
Lisa Mills,
James R. Miner,
Michelle Moghadassi,
Vicki E. Noble,
Gregory M. Press,
Marshall L. Stoller,
Victoria Valencia,
Jessica Wang,
Ralph C. Wang,
Steven R. Cummings
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
new england journal of medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 19.889
H-Index - 1030
eISSN - 1533-4406
pISSN - 0028-4793
DOI - 10.1056/nejmoa1404446
Subject(s) - medicine , radiology , ultrasonography , emergency department , medical diagnosis , incidence (geometry) , adverse effect , abdominal ultrasonography , abdominal pain , surgery , physics , psychiatry , optics
There is a lack of consensus about whether the initial imaging method for patients with suspected nephrolithiasis should be computed tomography (CT) or ultrasonography.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom