Karyotype versus Microarray Testing for Genetic Abnormalities after Stillbirth | Zendy

Uma M. Reddy | Zendy; Grier P. Page | Zendy; George R. Saade | Zendy; Robert M. Silver | Zendy; Vanessa Thorsten | Zendy; Corette B. Parker | Zendy; Halit Pınar | Zendy; Marian Willinger | Zendy; Barbara J. Stoll | Zendy; Josefine HeimHall | Zendy; Michael W. Varner | Zendy; Robert L. Goldenberg | Zendy; Radek Bukowski | Zendy; Ronald J. Wapner | Zendy; Carolyn DrewsBotsch | Zendy; Barbara O’Brien | Zendy; Donald J. Dudley | Zendy; Brynn Levy | Zendy

AI Assistant Blog Pricing

Home ZAIA Blog

Open Access

Karyotype versus Microarray Testing for Genetic Abnormalities after Stillbirth

Author(s) -

Uma M. Reddy,

Grier P. Page,

George R. Saade,

Robert M. Silver,

Vanessa Thorsten,

Corette B. Parker,

Halit Pınar,

Marian Willinger,

Barbara J. Stoll,

Josefine HeimHall,

Michael W. Varner,

Robert L. Goldenberg,

Radek Bukowski,

Ronald J. Wapner,

Carolyn DrewsBotsch,

Barbara O’Brien,

Donald J. Dudley,

Brynn Levy

Publication year - 2012

Publication title -

new england journal of medicine

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 19.889

H-Index - 1030

eISSN - 1533-4406

pISSN - 0028-4793

DOI - 10.1056/nejmoa1201569

Subject(s) - karyotype , microarray , microarray analysis techniques , genetic testing , genetics , biology , copy number variation , chromosome , computational biology , gene , genome , gene expression

Genetic abnormalities have been associated with 6 to 13% of stillbirths, but the true prevalence may be higher. Unlike karyotype analysis, microarray analysis does not require live cells, and it detects small deletions and duplications called copy-number variants.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research