A Randomized Trial of Prenatal versus Postnatal Repair of Myelomeningocele | Zendy

N. Scott Adzick | Zendy; Elizabeth Thom | Zendy; Catherine Y. Spong | Zendy; John W. Brock | Zendy; Pamela K. Burrows | Zendy; Mark P. Johnson | Zendy; Lori J. Howell | Zendy; Jody A. Farrell | Zendy; Mary E. Dabrowiak | Zendy; Leslie N. Sutton | Zendy; Nalin Gupta | Zendy; Noel Tulipan | Zendy; Diana L. Farmer | Zendy

AI Assistant Blog Pricing

Home ZAIA Blog

Open Access

A Randomized Trial of Prenatal versus Postnatal Repair of Myelomeningocele

Author(s) -

N. Scott Adzick,

Elizabeth Thom,

Catherine Y. Spong,

John W. Brock,

Pamela K. Burrows,

Mark P. Johnson,

Lori J. Howell,

Jody A. Farrell,

Mary E. Dabrowiak,

Leslie N. Sutton,

Nalin Gupta,

Noel Tulipan,

Diana L. Farmer

Publication year - 2011

Publication title -

new england journal of medicine

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 19.889

H-Index - 1030

eISSN - 1533-4406

pISSN - 0028-4793

DOI - 10.1056/nejmoa1014379

Subject(s) - medicine , fetal surgery , in utero , spina bifida , randomized controlled trial , surgery , relative risk , confidence interval , fetus , gestation , pregnancy , genetics , biology

Prenatal repair of myelomeningocele, the most common form of spina bifida, may result in better neurologic function than repair deferred until after delivery. We compared outcomes of in utero repair with standard postnatal repair.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research