Percutaneous Coronary Intervention versus Coronary-Artery Bypass Grafting for Severe Coronary Artery Disease | Zendy

Patrick W. Serruys | Zendy; MarieClaude Morice | Zendy; A. Pieter Kappetein | Zendy; Antonio Colombo | Zendy; David R. Holmes | Zendy; Michael J. Mack | Zendy; Elisabeth Ståhle | Zendy; Ted Feldman | Zendy; Marcel van den Brand | Zendy; Eric J. Bass | Zendy; Nic Van Dyck | Zendy; Katrin Leadley | Zendy; Keith D. Dawkins | Zendy; Friedrich W. Mohr | Zendy

AI Assistant Blog Pricing

Home ZAIA Blog

Open Access

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention versus Coronary-Artery Bypass Grafting for Severe Coronary Artery Disease

Author(s) -

Patrick W. Serruys,

MarieClaude Morice,

A. Pieter Kappetein,

Antonio Colombo,

David R. Holmes,

Michael J. Mack,

Elisabeth Ståhle,

Ted Feldman,

Marcel van den Brand,

Eric J. Bass,

Nic Van Dyck,

Katrin Leadley,

Keith D. Dawkins,

Friedrich W. Mohr

Publication year - 2009

Publication title -

new england journal of medicine

Language(s) - English

Resource type - Journals

SCImago Journal Rank - 19.889

H-Index - 1030

eISSN - 1533-4406

pISSN - 0028-4793

DOI - 10.1056/nejmoa0804626

Subject(s) - medicine , conventional pci , percutaneous coronary intervention , cardiology , myocardial infarction , revascularization , coronary artery disease , stroke (engine) , artery , mechanical engineering , engineering

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) involving drug-eluting stents is increasingly used to treat complex coronary artery disease, although coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG) has been the treatment of choice historically. Our trial compared PCI and CABG for treating patients with previously untreated three-vessel or left main coronary artery disease (or both).

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.

Having issues? You can contact us here

Accelerating Research