z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Value-based software metrics
Author(s) -
Barry Boehm
Publication year - 2004
Publication title -
citeseer x (the pennsylvania state university)
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Conference proceedings
DOI - 10.1049/ic:20040276
Subject(s) - computer science , software metric , software quality , dependability , metric (unit) , software sizing , reliability engineering , liveness , software reliability testing , software , verification and validation , software development , software construction , reliability (semiconductor) , software engineering , statistics , theoretical computer science , engineering , programming language , power (physics) , operations management , physics , mathematics , quantum mechanics
Many software metrics, particularly dependability metrics, are usually presented in a value-neutral framework. For example, the primary metric for Reliability, Mean Time Between Failures, is referenced to a one-size-fits-all (and often not explicitly defined) definition of “failure.” This can lead to serious problems, as when operators’ optimization on liveness produces user response times to queries of up to 2 weeks (an actual example). Clearly, unacceptable response time is a “failure” for some stakeholders that should be reflected in the metric definition. The paper presents some initial thoughts and a candidate approach for addressing this issue. 1. Current Interests USC’s Center for Software Engineering has been working on value-based software engineering for several years; see next section.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom