Open AccessMedico‐legal Rounds: Medico‐legal Issues and Alleged Breaches of “Standards of Medical Care” in Opioid Rotation to Methadone: A Case Report
Author(s) -
Fishbain David A.,
Cutler R.B.,
Cole Brandly,
Lewis John,
Rosomoff R. Steele,
Rosomoff H.L.
Publication year - 2003
Publication title -
pain medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.893
H-Index - 97
eISSN - 1526-4637
pISSN - 1526-2375
DOI - 10.1046/j.1526-4637.2003.03021.x
Subject(s) - methadone , medicine , plaintiff , oxycodone , opioid , addiction , chronic pain , psychiatry , medical emergency , law , political science , receptor
Objectives. The objectives of this medico‐legal case report were the following: 1) To present an example of a medico‐legal problem that developed as a result of a decision to rotate a chronic pain patient (CPP) to methadone in order to taper the CPP from oxycodone; 2) To present both the plaintiff's and defendant's expert witnesses’ opinions as to if and where the care of that patient fell below the “standard of medical care;” and 3) Based on these opinions, to develop some recommendations on how, in the future, pain medicine physicians and other physicians should proceed, in order to avoid allegations of breach of “standards of care” when using methadone. Methods. This is a case report of a CPP treated at a regional hospital pain clinic. Methadone rotation was used in order to taper the CPP from oxycodone because of addictive disease. Results. During the rotation process, the CPP expired. This had medico‐legal consequences. Expert witnesses differed as to whether methadone caused the death. Conclusion. Pain physicians should proceed with caution in using methadone for opioid rotation.