
Physician Awareness and Self‐reported Use of Local and National Guidelines for Community‐acquired Pneumonia
Author(s) -
Switzer Galen E.,
Halm Ethan A.,
Chang ChungChou H.,
Mittman Brian S.,
Walsh Mary B.,
Fine Michael J.
Publication year - 2003
Publication title -
journal of general internal medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.746
H-Index - 180
eISSN - 1525-1497
pISSN - 0884-8734
DOI - 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.20535.x
Subject(s) - medicine , guideline , specialty , family medicine , pneumonia , community acquired pneumonia , randomized controlled trial , medline , pathology , political science , law
OBJECTIVES: To assess physician awareness and reported use of medical guidelines for community‐acquired pneumonia (CAP), and to identify factors associated with variations in awareness and use of these guidelines. DESIGN: A questionnaire was administered during the preintervention phase of a randomized clinical trial of a pneumonia guideline implementation strategy. PARTICIPANTS: Three hundred and fifty‐two physicians who managed CAP patients at 7 Pittsburgh, PA hospitals completed the questionnaire. Physician and practice setting characteristics, and physician awareness and reported use of national American Thoracic Society (ATS) and local (hospital‐developed) guidelines for CAP were assessed. RESULTS: Overall, 48% reported being influenced by ATS guidelines and 20% reported using these guidelines; 48% were uncertain whether a local pneumonia guideline existed. Only 28% of physicians who knew a local guideline existed reported frequently using the guideline. Use of national ATS guidelines was independently associated with practice as an infectious disease or pulmonary medicine specialist, nonpatient care‐related professional activities, and intellect personality score. Use of local guidelines was independently negatively associated with practice as an infectious disease or pulmonary medicine specialist, and positively associated with positive attitudes toward practice guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: Results indicate low levels of awareness and use of guidelines for the management of CAP. Key indicators (e.g., medical specialty, fewer clinical duties, and positive attitudes about guidelines) were associated with greater use of national and local guidelines. If replicated with data on actual physician management practices, more effective guideline implementation strategies will be necessary to encourage compliance with practice guidelines for the management of CAP.