Open AccessSmoking Cessation in Primary Care Clinics
Author(s) -
Sippel Jeffrey M.,
Osborne Molly L.,
Bjornson Wendy,
Goldberg Bruce,
Buist A. Sonia
Publication year - 1999
Publication title -
journal of general internal medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.746
H-Index - 180
eISSN - 1525-1497
pISSN - 0884-8734
DOI - 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1999.11088.x
Subject(s) - medicine , smoking cessation , nicotine replacement therapy , spirometry , randomized controlled trial , intervention (counseling) , rate ratio , primary care , emergency medicine , family medicine , physical therapy , psychiatry , environmental health , population , asthma , pathology
OBJECTIVES: To document smoking cessation rates achieved by applying the 1996 Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (AHCPR) smoking cessation guidelines for primary care clinics, compare these quit rates with historical results, and determine if quit rates improve with an additional motivational intervention that includes education as well as spirometry and carbon monoxide measurements. DESIGN: Randomized clinical trial. SETTING: Two university‐affiliated community primary care clinics. PATIENTS: Two hundred five smokers with routinely scheduled appointments. INTERVENTION: All smokers were given advice and support according to AHCPR guidelines. Half of the subjects received additional education with spirometry and carbon monoxide measurements. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Quit rate was evaluated at 9‐month follow‐up. Eleven percent of smokers were sustained quitters at follow‐up. Sustained quit rate was no different for intervention and control groups (9% vs 14%; [OR] 0.6; 95%[CI] 0.2, 1.4). Nicotine replacement therapy was strongly associated with sustained cessation (OR 6.7; 95% CI 2.3, 19.6). Subjects without insurance were the least likely to use nicotine replacement therapy ( p = .05). Historical data from previously published studies showed that 2% of smokers quit following physician advice, and additional support similar to AHCPR guidelines increased the quit rate to 5%. CONCLUSIONS: The sustained smoking cessation rate achieved by following AHCPR guidelines was 11% at 9 months, which compares favorably with historical results. Additional education with spirometry did not improve the quit rate. Nicotine replacement therapy was the strongest predictor of cessation, yet was used infrequently owing to cost. These findings support the use of AHCPR guidelines in primary care clinics, but do not support routine spirometry for motivating patients similar to those studied here.