z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Timing analysis of the isolated neutron star RX J0720.4−3125
Author(s) -
Zane Silvia,
Haberl Frank,
Cropper Mark,
Zavlin Vyacheslav E.,
Lumb David,
Sembay Steve,
Motch Christian
Publication year - 2002
Publication title -
monthly notices of the royal astronomical society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.058
H-Index - 383
eISSN - 1365-2966
pISSN - 0035-8711
DOI - 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05480.x
Subject(s) - physics , astrophysics , neutron star , rosat , magnetar , luminosity , dynamo , field (mathematics) , spin (aerodynamics) , galaxy , magnetic field , mathematics , quantum mechanics , pure mathematics , thermodynamics
We present a combined analysis of XMM–Newton , Chandra and ROSAT observations of the isolated neutron star RX J0720.4−3125, spanning a total period of ∼7 yr. We develop a maximum likelihood periodogram for our analysis based on the Δ C statistic and the maximum likelihood method, which are appropriate for the treatment of sparse event lists. Our results have been checked a posteriori by folding a further BeppoSAX data set with the period predicted at the time of that observation: the phase is found to be consistent. The study of the spin history and the measure of the spin‐down rate are of extreme importance in discriminating between the possible mechanisms suggested for the nature of the X‐ray emission. The value of P˙ , here measured for the first time, is ≈10 −14  s s −1 . This value cannot be explained in terms of torque from a fossil disc. When interpreted in terms of dipolar losses, it gives a magnetic field of B ≈10 13  G , making it also implausible that the source is accreting from the underdense surroundings. On the other hand, we also find it unlikely that the field decayed from a much larger value ( B ≈10 15  G , as expected for a magnetar powered by dissipation of a superstrong field) since this scenario predicts a source age of ≈10 4  yr, too young to match the observed X‐ray luminosity. The observed properties are more compatible with a scenario in which the source is ≈10 6  yr old, and its magnetic field has not changed substantially over the lifetime.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here