z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
The bivariate brightness function of galaxies and a demonstration of the impact of surface brightness selection effects on luminosity function estimations
Author(s) -
Cross Nicholas,
Driver Simon P.
Publication year - 2002
Publication title -
monthly notices of the royal astronomical society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.058
H-Index - 383
eISSN - 1365-2966
pISSN - 0035-8711
DOI - 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05052.x
Subject(s) - physics , surface brightness , astrophysics , luminosity function , galaxy , luminosity , brightness , surface brightness fluctuation , redshift , absolute magnitude , fundamental plane (elliptical galaxies) , redshift survey , gaussian , galaxy formation and evolution , astronomy , lenticular galaxy , brightest cluster galaxy , quantum mechanics
In this paper we fit an analytic function to the bivariate brightness distribution (BBD) of galaxies. It is a combination of the classical Schechter Function convolved with a Gaussian distribution in surface brightness: thus incorporating the luminosity–surface brightness correlation as seen in many recent data sets. We fit this function to a recent measurement of the BBD based on 45 000 galaxies from the Two‐Degree Field Galaxy Redshift Survey. The parameters for the best‐fitting model are ,,,, and. φ *, and α equate to the conventional Schechter parameters. β is the slope of the luminosity–surface brightness correlation, is the characteristic effective surface brightness at and σ is the width of the Gaussian. Using a BBF we explore the impact of the limiting detection isophote on classical measures of the galaxy luminosity distribution. We demonstrate that if isophotal magnitudes are used then errors of , per cent and are likely for. If Gaussian corrected magnitudes are used these change to, per cent and for. Hence while the faint‐end slope, α , appears fairly robust to surface brightness issues, both the M * and φ * values are highly dependent. The range over which these parameters were seen to vary is fully consistent with the scatter in the published values, reproducing the range of observed luminosity densities). If total magnitudes are recovered then there is no change in the luminosity function within the errors for. We conclude that surface brightness selection effects are primarily responsible for this variation. After due consideration of these effects, we derive a value of.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here