Open AccessThe real‐ and redshift‐space density distribution functions for large‐scale structure in the spherical collapse approximation
Author(s) -
Scherrer Robert J.,
Gaztañaga Enrique
Publication year - 2001
Publication title -
monthly notices of the royal astronomical society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.058
H-Index - 383
eISSN - 1365-2966
pISSN - 0035-8711
DOI - 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04856.x
Subject(s) - physics , redshift , smoothing , space (punctuation) , astrophysics , cosmology , amplitude , redshift space distortions , statistical physics , redshift survey , quantum mechanics , statistics , galaxy , mathematics , linguistics , philosophy
We use the spherical collapse (SC) approximation to derive expressions for the smoothed redshift‐space probability distribution function (PDF), as well as the p ‐order hierarchical amplitudes S p , in both real and redshift space. We compare our results with numerical simulations, focusing on the standard CDM model, where redshift distortions are strongest. We find good agreement between the SC predictions and the numerical PDF in real space even for , where σ L is the linearly evolved rms fluctuation on the smoothing scale. In redshift space, reasonable agreement is possible only for . Numerical simulations also yield a simple empirical relation between the real‐space PDF and the redshift‐space PDF: we find that for , the redshift‐space PDF, [ P δ ( z ) ], is, to a good approximation, a simple rescaling of the real‐space PDF, P [ δ ], i.e., where σ and σ ( z ) are the real‐space and redshift‐space rms fluctuations, respectively. This result applies well beyond the validity of linear perturbation theory, and it is a good fit for both the standard CDM model and the ΛCDM model. It breaks down for SCDM at , but provides a good fit to the ΛCDM models for σ L as large as 0.8.