Open AccessThe excitation and kinematical properties of H 2 and [Fe ii ] in the HH 46/47 bipolar outflow
Author(s) -
Fernandes A. J. L.
Publication year - 2000
Publication title -
monthly notices of the royal astronomical society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.058
H-Index - 383
eISSN - 1365-2966
pISSN - 0035-8711
DOI - 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03437.x
Subject(s) - physics , outflow , astrophysics , bipolar outflow , herbig–haro object , jet (fluid) , excitation , redshift , emission spectrum , line (geometry) , spectral line , infrared , acceleration , astronomy , star formation , stars , galaxy , geometry , mathematics , quantum mechanics , meteorology , classical mechanics , thermodynamics
Long‐slit spectra of the molecular outflow Herbig–Haro (HH) 46/47 have been taken in the J and K near‐infrared bands. The observed H 2 line emission confirms the existence of a bright and extended redshifted counter‐jet outflow south‐west of HH 46. In contrast with the optical appearance of this object, we show that this outflow seems to be composed of two different emission regions characterized by distinct heliocentric velocities. This implies an acceleration of the counter‐jet. The observed [Fe ii ] emission suggests an average extinction of 7–9 visual magnitudes for the region associated with the counter‐jet. Through position–velocity diagrams, we show the existence of different morphologies for the H 2 and [Fe ii ] emission regions in the northern part of the HH 46/47 outflow. We have detected for the first time high‐velocity (−250 km s −1 ) [Fe ii ] emission in the region bridging HH 46 to HH 47A. The two strong peaks detected can be identified with the optical positions B8 and HH 47B. The H 2 excitation diagrams for the counter‐jet shock suggest an excitation temperature for the gas of T ex ≈2600 K. The lack of emission from the higher energy H 2 lines, such as the 4–3 S(3) transition, suggests a thermal excitation scenario for the origin of the observed emission. Comparison of the H 2 line ratios with various shock models yielded useful constraints about the geometry and type of these shocks. Planar shocks can be ruled out whereas curved or bow shocks (both J‐ and C‐type) can be parametrized to fit our data.