z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
The non‐Gaussian tail of cosmic‐shear statistics
Author(s) -
Kruse Guido,
Schneider Peter
Publication year - 2000
Publication title -
monthly notices of the royal astronomical society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.058
H-Index - 383
eISSN - 1365-2966
pISSN - 0035-8711
DOI - 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03389.x
Subject(s) - physics , gaussian , gaussian random field , astrophysics , cosmic cancer database , galaxy , kurtosis , dark matter , statistical physics , gaussian function , statistics , quantum mechanics , mathematics
Owing to gravitational instability, an initially Gaussian density field develops non‐Gaussian features as the Universe evolves. The most prominent non‐Gaussian features are massive haloes, visible as clusters of galaxies. The distortion of high‐redshift galaxy images because of the tidal gravitational field of the large‐scale matter distribution, called cosmic shear, can be used to investigate the statistical properties of the large‐scale structure (LSS). In particular, non‐Gaussian properties of the LSS will lead to a non‐Gaussian distribution of cosmic‐shear statistic. The aperture mass ( M ap ) statistics, recently introduced as a measure for cosmic shear, is particularly well suited for measuring these non‐Gaussian properties. In this paper we calculate the highly non‐Gaussian tail of the aperture mass probability distribution, assuming Press–Schechter theory for the halo abundance and the ‘universal’ density profile of haloes as obtained from numerical simulations. We find that for values of M ap much larger than its dispersion, this probability distribution is closely approximated by an exponential, rather than a Gaussian. We determine the amplitude and shape of this exponential for various cosmological models and aperture sizes, and show that wide‐field imaging surveys can be used to distinguish between some of the currently most popular cosmogonies. Our study here is complementary to earlier cosmic‐shear investigations, which focused more on two‐ and three‐point statistical properties.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here