z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Shear wave structure from joint analysis of seismic and seafloor compliance data
Author(s) -
Hulme Tom,
Ricolleau Angèle,
Bazin Sara,
Crawford Wayne C.,
Singh S. C.
Publication year - 2003
Publication title -
geophysical journal international
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.302
H-Index - 168
eISSN - 1365-246X
pISSN - 0956-540X
DOI - 10.1046/j.1365-246x.2003.02061.x
Subject(s) - geology , seismology , shear (geology) , shear wave splitting , seafloor spreading , crust , seismic anisotropy , attenuation , shear waves , vertical seismic profile , anisotropy , seismic wave , poisson's ratio , poisson distribution , geophysics , mantle (geology) , petrology , physics , statistics , optics , mathematics
SUMMARY Determining shear wave structure is the key to identifying the amount and location of fluid within the crust. Seismic and seafloor compliance methods provide independent estimates of shear wave structure, and a joint analysis of the two data sets should provide better constraints on the properties of the uppermost oceanic crust. We consider an example from 9°33′N on the East Pacific Rise. Seismic data from an on‐axis expanding spread profile have been reanalysed to determine a shear wave structure for layer 2B; pS arrivals require a high shear wave velocity within this layer (Poisson ratio in the range 0.22–0.25). Compliance data from the same location are seemingly inconsistent with this result, requiring that layer 2B is a region of low shear wave velocity (Poisson ratio in the range 0.33–0.44). The quantitative differences between the two results can be explained by anelasticity and anisotropy; conversely, a knowledge of this discrepancy can be used to constrain the attenuation structure.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here