Synfolding remagnetization and deformation: results from Palaeozoic sedimentary rocks in West Virginia

SUMMARY Palaeomagnetic analysis was conducted at 27 sites from two stratigraphically adjacent Palaeozoic units along two transects (Meldey and Rig) of the Patterson Creek anticline in the Appalachian orogen of West Virginia to better understand the relationship between deformation and remagnetization. While no primary directions were observed, we isolated identical, well‐defined, secondary Late Palaeozoic magnetizations in carbonates from the Late Silurian Tonoloway Formation and the Early Devonian Helderberg Group. Standard application of conventional palaeomagnetic fold tests suggests that the magnetizations are synfolding in the Helderberg Group and pre‐folding to early synfolding in the Tonoloway Formation. A fold test on all data combined indicates a synfolding magnetization (best grouping at 60–65 per cent unfolding), but the resulting distributions are not circular. An alternative interpretation, based on optimal differential unfolding at the site mean level yields one group with a nearly pre‐folding, or early synfolding, magnetization ( >70 per cent unfolding) that is both circular and concordant with North America's apparent polar wander path. The second group has a ‘variable synfolding’ magnetization that is elliptical at the optimum unfolding level and falls off the path. Differences in either the age of remagnetization or viscous partial thermoremanent magnetization contamination cannot account for this result. The sites falling into the pre‐folding group are biased towards the Tonoloway Formation, the Medley Transect, the northwest limb, away from small folds and lower dip angle relative to the sites in the synfolding group. The two groups defined by the fold test results also have a relationship with both total strain and strain partitioning. The rocks containing the early synfolding remanence exhibit less total strain and, in particular, less pressure solution strain relative to grain boundary sliding and calcite twinning. It is likely that the remagnetization in the entire area was coincident and occurred prior to folding even though some sites reveal synfolding directions. The variation in the behaviour of the remagnetization relative to folding is unclear at present but it indicates that pressure solution and stylolite formation are important processes in remagnetization. In any event, the relationship between deformation and magnetization is not simple. Apparently identical magnetizations from adjacent sites may have very different histories and/or responses to deformation. While the exact relationship between remagnetization and deformation remains elusive this study demonstrates that significant variation in behaviour can exist at a very local scale.