z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Numerical models of the evolution of accretionary wedges and fold‐and‐thrust belts using the distinct‐element method
Author(s) -
Burbidge D. R.,
Braun J.
Publication year - 2002
Publication title -
geophysical journal international
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.302
H-Index - 168
eISSN - 1365-246X
pISSN - 0956-540X
DOI - 10.1046/j.1365-246x.2002.01579.x
Subject(s) - geology , thrust , wedge (geometry) , accretionary wedge , thrust fault , finite element method , deformation (meteorology) , geometry , accretion (finance) , fold and thrust belt , seismology , subduction , fault (geology) , physics , tectonics , mathematics , oceanography , astrophysics , thermodynamics , foreland basin
SUMMARY A 2‐D numerical model is used to investigate the evolution of accretionary wedges and fold‐and‐thrust belts. The numerical method is based on the distinct‐element method (DEM). Unlike many continuum numerical models, DEM allows localization to occur even after substantial amounts of deformation. The method is used to study the evolution of simple accretionary wedges and thrust belts with a rigid backstop and base. Experiments are done with a large range of coefficients of interelement friction ( μ e ) and element‐wall friction ( μ b ). Two modes of deformation, which depend mainly on μ b , are observed. For the weak base case (low μ b ), the dominant mode is frontal accretion by ‘pop‐up’ structures at or near the toe of the wedge. For the strong base case (high μ b ), uplift is concentrated near the back of the wedge, and is accompanied by underthrusting along a flat‐ramp‐flat (or ‘staircase’) thrust fault structure. At intermediate values of μ b , the wedge oscillates between the two modes of deformation. During periods of frontal accretion, normal faulting sometimes occurs in regions where the material has thickened considerably. The transition between the two modes of deformation is found to be a strong function of μ b but a weak function of μ e . A simple explanation of the experimental results is made using the principle of work minimization. Comparisons between the results and some accretionary wedges/fold‐and‐thrust belts are also made.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here