A detailed analysis of the February 1996 aftershock sequence in the eastern Pyrenees, France

Following the 1996 February 18 M L  = 5.2 earthquake in the Agly massif in the eastern French Pyrenees, we installed a temporary network of seismometers around the epicentre. In this paper, we analyse 336 well‐located aftershocks recorded from February 19 to February 23 by 18 temporary stations and two permanent stations located less than 35 km from the epicentre. Most aftershocks have been located with an accuracy better than 1.5 km in both horizontal and vertical positions. Their spatial distribution suggests the reactivation of a known fault system. We determined 39 fault‐plane solutions using P ‐wave first motions. Despite their diversity, the focal mechanisms yield an E–W subhorizontal T‐axis. We also determined fault‐plane solutions and principal stress axes using the method developed by Rivera & Cisternas (1990) for the 15 best‐recorded events. We obtain a pure‐shear‐rupture tectonic regime under N–S subhorizontal compression and E–W subhorizontal extension. These principal stress axes, which explain the focal mechanisms for at least 75 per cent of the 39 aftershocks, are different from the axes deduced from the main shock. The post‐earthquake stress field caused by the main‐shock rupture, modelled as sinistral strike slip on three vertical fault segments, is computed for various orientations and magnitudes of the regional stress field, assumed to be horizontal. The aftershock distribution is best explained for a compressive stress field oriented N30°E. Most aftershocks concentrate where the Coulomb failure stress change increases by more than 0.2 MPa. The diversity of aftershock focal mechanisms, poorly explained by this model, may reflect the great diversity in the orientations of pre‐existing fractures in the Agly massif.