
Clinical assessment of positron emission tomography for the diagnosis of local recurrence in colorectal cancer
Author(s) -
Takeuchi O.,
Saito N.,
Koda K.,
Sarashina H.,
Nakajima N.
Publication year - 1999
Publication title -
british journal of surgery
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.202
H-Index - 201
eISSN - 1365-2168
pISSN - 0007-1323
DOI - 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1999.01178.x
Subject(s) - medicine , colorectal cancer , positron emission tomography , radiology , magnetic resonance imaging , pelvis , biopsy , differential diagnosis , nuclear medicine , standardized uptake value , positron emission , cancer , rectum , pathology , surgery
Background: The clinical value of positron emission tomography (PET) for the diagnosis of local pelvic recurrence of colorectal cancer was evaluated. Methods: Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the pelvis were performed at regular intervals in 23 patients who had undergone resection for colorectal cancer. The 23 patients had a total of 25 lesions. PET images of the 25 lesions and of six primary lesions in patients with rectal cancer were obtained. A differential absorption ratio (DAR) was calculated in order to examine the accumulation of [ 18 F]2‐fluoro‐2‐deoxy‐ D ‐glucose ( 18 FDG) on PET images. Histological diagnoses of the pelvic masses were obtained by CT‐guided needle biopsy. Results: On CT or MRI, a pelvic mass with a spicular shape ( n = 1) was non‐recurrent, whereas a nodular or lumpy shape indicated a locally recurrent lesion ( n = 10). Masses with a nodulospicular shape ( n = 12) did not correlate with the histological features. On PET, 15 of 16 histologically proven local recurrences were imaged positively. By setting a DAR of 2·8 as a cut‐off value, local recurrences could be diagnosed with 100 per cent accuracy. Conclusion: PET is a clinically useful tool for the detection of local recurrence of colorectal cancer, particularly for distinguishing between recurrence and granulation tissues in the pelvic cavity. © 2000 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd