Open AccessAudit of methods of laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Author(s) -
Chitre V. V.,
Studley J. G. N.
Publication year - 1999
Publication title -
british journal of surgery
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.202
H-Index - 201
eISSN - 1365-2168
pISSN - 0007-1323
DOI - 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1999.00989.x
Subject(s) - medicine , veress needle , cholecystectomy , general surgery , audit , surgery , cholangiography , laparoscopic cholecystectomy , laparoscopy , port (circuit theory) , laparoscopic surgery , management , electrical engineering , economics , engineering
Background: The operation of laparoscopic cholecystectomy began the modern era of laparoscopic surgery. Refinements in technique continue to appear. The techniques currently favoured by British surgeons have been reviewed. Methods: A questionnaire‐based survey was carried out among surgeons with a special interest in minimal access surgery. The data collected were entered into a database and analysed. Current literature relating to surgical technique was reviewed. Results: Many aspects were evaluated and the results have shown that there is no uniform approach. It is interesting that only 30·8 per cent of surgeons use the open (Hasson) technique for peritoneal access. In addition, the use of intraoperative cholangiography continues to vary, with 65·8 per cent using the technique in selected cases. Fascial repair is not undertaken by 12·2 per cent of surgeons. Conclusion: Some trends are clearly discernible. There is a greater willingness than previously to perform intraoperative cholangiography, but the consensus seems to be against performing it in all cases. Similarly, British surgeons seem to be largely unimpressed by the dangers of the Veress needle; the Hasson technique has not been widely adopted. The need to prevent port‐site herniation seems to be generally accepted, with most surgeons performing fascial repair. © 1999 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd