z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
All are one and one is all: sexual uniformity among widely separated populations of the North American seal salamander, Desmognathus monticola
Author(s) -
MABRY MICHELLE,
VERRELL PAUL
Publication year - 2003
Publication title -
biological journal of the linnean society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.906
H-Index - 112
eISSN - 1095-8312
pISSN - 0024-4066
DOI - 10.1046/j.1095-8312.2003.00162.x
Subject(s) - biology , salamander , courtship , ecology , mating , range (aeronautics) , zoology , evolutionary biology , composite material , materials science
The Modern Synthesis of the mid‐20th century effectively buried typological definitions and descriptions of species and their boundaries. This interment is well supported by the large number of animal species for which substantial levels of sexual incompatibility have been found among conspecific populations, including some species of North American desmognathine salamanders that have restricted geographical ranges. We tested for sexual incompatibility and variation in sexual signals and responses among widely separated populations of the broadly distributed seal salamander, Desmognathus monticola . Levels of sexual incompatibility and differences in behaviour patterns exhibited during courtship and mating were modest to non‐existent among these populations, despite the considerable geographical distances separating some of them. Our data are not consistent with results obtained in the majority of similar studies that have been conducted on congeneric species. For the seal salamander, we cannot reject the applicability of a typological species definition based on sexual compatibility and uniformity in the ethology of courtship among populations. We present five hypotheses (not necessarily mutually exclusive) that may explain our results. We suggest that recent range expansion, perhaps coupled with contemporary gene flow, may best explain sexual uniformity among populations of the seal salamander. © 2003 The Linnean Society of London, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society , 2003, 78 , 1–10.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here