
Parasites and the blackcap's tail: implications for the evolution of feather ornaments
Author(s) -
PÉREZTRIS JAVIER,
CARBONELL ROBERTO,
TELLERÍA JOSÉ LUIS
Publication year - 2002
Publication title -
biological journal of the linnean society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.906
H-Index - 112
eISSN - 1095-8312
pISSN - 0024-4066
DOI - 10.1046/j.1095-8312.2002.00083.x
Subject(s) - feather , biology , passerine , mite , moulting , parasitism , zoology , acari , ecology , ornaments , parasite load , host (biology) , larva , history , archaeology , style (visual arts) , immune system , immunology
Although parasites may impair the expression of tail ornaments in birds, the importance of parasitism in driving the evolution of the initial stages of tail ornamentation is not well understood. Parasites could have negatively affected the expression of nonexaggerated, functional traits before these evolved ornaments, or they could have played a relevant role only after tails became ornamental and hence too costly to produce. To shed light on this issue, we studied the correlation between the abundance of feather mites (Acari, Proctophyllodidae) and the size, quality, growth rate and symmetry of tail feathers of blackcaps ( Sylvia atricapilla ), a non‐ornamented passerine. Tail length was not correlated with mite load, yet blackcaps holding many mites at the moment of feather growth (fledglings) had lighter and more asymmetric feathers that grew at relatively lower rates. In blackcaps whose mite load was measured one year after feather growth (adults), only the negative correlation between mite intensity and feather symmetry remained significant. Changes in mite load since the moult season could have erased the correlation between condition‐dependent feather traits and current parasite load in adults. Our results support the idea that different traits of non‐ornamental feathers can signal parasite resistance. Therefore, parasitism could have played a central role in the evolution of tail ornamentation ever since its initial stages. © 2002 The Linnean Society of London. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society , 2002, 76 , 481–492.