Open AccessEffects of anisotropy on the two‐dimensional inversion procedure
Author(s) -
Heise Wiebke,
Pous Jaume
Publication year - 2001
Publication title -
geophysical journal international
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.302
H-Index - 168
eISSN - 1365-246X
pISSN - 0956-540X
DOI - 10.1046/j.0956-540x.2001.01560.x
Subject(s) - anisotropy , isotropy , curse of dimensionality , inversion (geology) , geology , azimuth , geophysics , geometry , physics , optics , mathematics , seismology , statistics , tectonics
Summary In this paper we show some of the effects that appear in magnetotelluric measurements over 2‐D anisotropic structures, and propose a procedure to recover the anisotropy using 2‐D inversion algorithms for isotropic models. First, we see how anisotropy affects the usual interpretation steps: dimensionality analysis and 2‐D inversion. Two models containing general 2‐D azimuthal anisotropic features were chosen to illustrate this approach: an anisotropic block and an anisotropic layer, both forming part of general 2‐D models. In addition, a third model with dipping anisotropy was studied. For each model we examined the influence of various anisotropy strikes and resistivity contrasts on the dimensionality analysis and on the behaviour of the induction arrows. We found that, when the anisotropy ratio is higher than five, even if the strike is frequency‐dependent it is possible to decide on a direction close to the direction of anisotropy. Then, if the data are rotated to this angle, a 2‐D inversion reproduces the anisotropy reasonably well by means of macro‐anisotropy. This strategy was tested on field data where anisotropy had been previously recognized.