z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
PGS: a four-letter word?
Author(s) -
Darren K. Griffin,
Çağri Oğur
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
the biochemist
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.126
H-Index - 7
eISSN - 1740-1194
pISSN - 0954-982X
DOI - 10.1042/bio04003026
Subject(s) - miscarriage , preimplantation genetic diagnosis , live birth , embryo , embryo transfer , gynecology , pregnancy , genetic diagnosis , obstetrics , medicine , abortion , biology , genetics , gene
Preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) involves the identification of chromosome abnormalities in IVF embryos (rather than targeting diagnosis to a specified gene). Chiefly employed for couples with advanced maternal age, recurrent miscarriage or recurrent IVF failure, it aims to improve IVF success, and reduce miscarriage and affected live birth rates. The process involves the sampling of cells by embryo biopsy, cytogenetic diagnosis, then selective transfer of an apparently chromosomally normal embryo in the hope of establishing a pregnancy. Although PGS is the most common variant of PGD (preimplantation genetic diagnosis), accounting for 80% of cases it has, from the outset, been one of the most controversial areas of reproductive medicine. The subject of intense debate, it attracts opinions ranging from recommendations that it should be applied in all IVF cases, through to the suggestion it should be discontinued completely. What do you think? Should it continue or not?

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom