Autophagy and cell death: The jury's still out
Author(s) -
Jon D. Lane,
Virginie M.S. Betin,
Lilith Mannack,
Tom D.B. MacVicar
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
the biochemist
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.126
H-Index - 7
eISSN - 1740-1194
pISSN - 0954-982X
DOI - 10.1042/bio03402014
Subject(s) - autophagy , circumstantial evidence , jury , programmed cell death , microbiology and biotechnology , biology , apoptosis , cytoplasm , political science , genetics , law
Since the publication of seminal work in the early 1970s by John Kerr and Andrew Wyllie1, we have been aware that mammalian cells have the genetically encoded capability to give up the ghost and trigger a highly conserved cell-suicide pathway called apoptosis. Not content with this important knowledge, many researchers have spent the intervening years attempting to identify and characterize other ‘programmed cell death’ (PCD) mechanisms that might also have important roles in development and disease. One of these was ‘autophagy’, a process by which cells became vacuolated and progressively devoid of cytoplasm. Over the years, ‘autophagic cell death’ has been linked with the timely death of cells in development, as well as the catastrophic loss of cells in several important human diseases. But is autophagy truly a cell death mechanism in its own right? Perhaps it is just an innocent bystander, unfairly accused on the basis of flimsy circumstantial evidence? The jury may finally be poised to return a decisive verdict….
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom