English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Recently, Costa et al. published an article about promising biomarkers for estimating the postmortem interval. Instead of postmortem blood, antemortem blood was putrefied in vitro by exposing the blood to a temperature gradient. However, in this way several other influencing factors were excluded, hence, the accuracy of the proposed model is doubtful. Therefore, the aim of this comment is to discuss the methodology, results and shortcomings of the study of Costa et al.

toxicology research

Comment on “Promising blood-derived biomarkers for estimation of the postmortem interval” by I. Costa, F. Carvalho, T. Magalhães, P. G. de Pinho, R. Silvestre &amp; R. J. Dinis-Oliveira. (<i>Toxicol. Res.</i>, 2015, 4, 1443–1452)

Comment on “Promising blood-derived biomarkers for estimation of the postmortem interval” by I. Costa, F. Carvalho, T. Magalhães, P. G. de Pinho, R. Silvestre & R. J. Dinis-Oliveira. (Toxicol. Res., 2015, 4, 1443–1452)