z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Evaluation of rural wastewater treatment processes in a county of eastern China
Author(s) -
Huiyu Dong,
Zhimin Qiang,
Weidong Wang,
Hui Jin
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
journal of environmental monitoring
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1464-0333
pISSN - 1464-0325
DOI - 10.1039/c2em10976j
Subject(s) - effluent , environmental science , wastewater , urbanization , sewage treatment , total suspended solids , septic tank , china , water quality , environmental engineering , wetland , rural area , chemical oxygen demand , water resource management , waste management , geography , ecology , engineering , medicine , archaeology , pathology , biology
With the rapid urbanization and industrialization in China, wastewater treatment in rural areas has become an increasing national concern. The selection of appropriate treatment processes closely based on the actual local status is crucial for the prevention of water quality deterioration in rural areas of China. This study presents a full year survey on the performances of various rural wastewater treatment processes at a county level in eastern China including seven three-chamber septic tanks (ST), five micro-power biological facilities (MP), seven constructed wetlands (CW), three stabilization ponds (SP) and five centralized activated sludge treatment plants (AS). It was found that although ST could remove a notable portion of total suspended solids (TSS) and chemical oxygen demand (COD(Cr)), it was ineffective in reducing nutrients and pathogens. Reliability and stability analyses showed that the centralized AS and decentralized CW processes outperformed the SP and MP processes. There were obvious discrepancies between the mean design concentrations, which ensure that 95% of the effluents meet the discharge standards, and the actual effluent concentrations determined for each process. The expected compliance with the tentatively adopted second-grade discharge standards (GB 18918-2002) was unsatisfactory for most of the water quality parameters examined, indicating an urgent need to design more practical discharge standards for decentralized treatment processes. Based on an overall assessment of reliability, stability and cost-effectiveness, the centralized AS was suitable for densely populated towns while the decentralized CW was suitable for sparsely populated villages.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom