Clinicopathologic analysis of programmed cell death-1 and programmed cell death-ligand 1 and 2 expressions in pulmonary adenocarcinoma: comparison with histology and driver oncogenic alteration status
Author(s) -
Jaemoon Koh,
Heounjeong Go,
Bhumsuk Keam,
MoonYoung Kim,
Soo Jeong Nam,
Tae Min Kim,
SeHoon Lee,
Hye Sook Min,
Young Tae Kim,
DongWan Kim,
Yoon Kyung Jeon,
Doo Hyun Chung
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
modern pathology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.596
H-Index - 153
eISSN - 1530-0285
pISSN - 0893-3952
DOI - 10.1038/modpathol.2015.63
Subject(s) - programmed cell death , cd8 , adenocarcinoma , pathology , cancer research , cell , biology , immunohistochemistry , cancer , medicine , apoptosis , immunology , antigen , genetics
Immunotherapies targeting the programmed cell death-1/programmed cell death-ligand 1 pathway have emerged as promising therapeutic strategies for lung cancer. However, the expression pattern and prognostic implications of programmed cell death-ligand 1 and 2 and programmed cell death-1 in comparison with the histology and genetic alterations in pulmonary adenocarcinomas remains unclear and thus were addressed here. Programmed cell death-ligand 1 and 2 expression in tumor cells and the quantities of programmed cell death-1(+) and CD8(+) tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes were immunohistochemically evaluated in 497 resected pulmonary adenocarcinomas and analyzed according to clinicopathological and genetic statuses. Programmed cell death-ligand 1 and 2 expression were observed in 59% and 64% of pulmonary adenocarcinomas, respectively, and showed a strong positive correlation with each other (P < 0.001). Programmed cell death-ligand 1 expression was higher in nodal metastasis cases (P = 0.006), smokers (P = 0.056), poorly differentiated tumors and histologic subtypes of solid and micropapillary patterns (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in programmed cell death-ligand 1 and 2 expression according to EGFR mutation status. However, programmed cell death-ligand 1 expression was correlated with ALK translocation (P =0.054) and expression of EGFR and MET (P < 0.001). Meanwhile, programmed cell death-ligand 2 expression was correlated with ALK translocation (P = 0.052), and expression of MET (P < 0.001) and ERBB2 (P = 0.013). The numbers of CD8(+) and programmed cell death-1(+) lymphocytes were higher in smokers (P = 0.012 and 0.016) and MET-expressing adenocarcinomas (P < 0.001). Patients expressing programmed cell death-ligand 1 and/or high ratios of programmed cell death-1(+)/CD8(+) lymphocytes showed shorter disease-free survival (P = 0.001). Our study demonstrated that programmed cell death-ligand 1 and 2 expression varied with histology, EGFR, ALK, MET, and ERBB2 statuses, and activation of the programmed cell death-1/programmed cell death-ligand 1 pathway may be a poor prognostic factor in pulmonary adenocarcinomas.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom