z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Comparison of two generalized transfer functions for measuring central systolic blood pressure by an oscillometric blood pressure monitor
Author(s) -
Shih Yt,
Cheng Huang,
Sung Sh,
Wei-Chih Hu,
Chen Ch
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
journal of human hypertension
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.737
H-Index - 95
eISSN - 1476-5527
pISSN - 0950-9240
DOI - 10.1038/jhh.2012.17
Subject(s) - medicine , blood pressure , aortic pressure , cuff , pulse pressure , cardiology , waveform , aorta , diastole , biomedical engineering , surgery , physics , quantum mechanics , voltage
Central aortic systolic blood pressure (SBP-C) can be estimated from a cuff oscillometric waveform derived during the pulse volume plethysmography (PVP) by applying a device-specific aortic pressure-to-PVP waveform-generalized transfer function (A2P(GTF)). The present study compared the performance of an aortic-to-brachial pressure waveforms generalized transfer function (A2B(GTF)), which is independent of any PVP devices, with an A2P(GTF). Generalized transfer function of aortic-to-brachial (A2B(GTF)) and aortic-to-PVP (A2P(GTF)) were generated from the simultaneously obtained central aortic and brachial pressure waveforms recorded by a high-fidelity dual pressure sensor catheter, and the PVP waveform recorded by a customized noninvasive blood pressure monitor during cardiac catheterization in 40 patients, and were then applied in another 100 patients with simultaneously recorded invasive aortic pressure and noninvasively calibrated (using cuff SBP and diastolic blood pressures) PVP waveforms. The mean difference±s.d. between the noninvasively estimated and invasively recorded SBP-C was -2.1±7.7 mm Hg for A2B(GTF), which was not greater than that of -3.0±7.7 mm Hg for A2P(GTF) (P<0.01). In conclusion, SBP-C can be measured reliably using a noninvasive blood pressure monitor by applying either an A2P(GTF) or A2B(GTF) to a noninvasively calibrated PVP waveform. The performance of an A2B(GTF) is not inferior to that of an A2P(GTF).

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here