z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Progression of MRI markers in cerebral small vessel disease: Sample size considerations for clinical trials
Author(s) -
Philip Benjamin,
Eva Zeestraten,
Christian Lambert,
Irina Chis Ster,
Owen A. Williams,
Andrew J. Lawrence,
Bhavini Patel,
Andrew D. MacKin,
Thomas R. Barrick,
Hugh S. Markus
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.167
H-Index - 193
eISSN - 1559-7016
pISSN - 0271-678X
DOI - 10.1038/jcbfm.2015.113
Subject(s) - leukoaraiosis , neuroimaging , magnetic resonance imaging , hyperintensity , white matter , medicine , brain size , diffusion mri , sample size determination , stroke (engine) , clinical trial , lacunar stroke , cognitive decline , cognition , cardiology , psychology , radiology , disease , dementia , ischemic stroke , psychiatry , ischemia , mechanical engineering , statistics , mathematics , engineering
Detecting treatment efficacy using cognitive change in trials of cerebral small vessel disease (SVD) has been challenging, making the use of surrogate markers such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) attractive. We determined the sensitivity of MRI to change in SVD and used this information to calculate sample size estimates for a clinical trial. Data from the prospective SCANS (St George’s Cognition and Neuroimaging in Stroke) study of patients with symptomatic lacunar stroke and confluent leukoaraiosis was used (n = 121). Ninety-nine subjects returned at one or more time points. Multimodal MRI and neuropsychologic testing was performed annually over 3 years. We evaluated the change in brain volume, T2 white matter hyperintensity (WMH) volume, lacunes, and white matter damage on diffusion tensor imaging (DTI). Over 3 years, change was detectable in all MRI markers but not in cognitive measures. WMH volume and DTI parameters were most sensitive to change and therefore had the smallest sample size estimates. MRI markers, particularly WMH volume and DTI parameters, are more sensitive to SVD progression over short time periods than cognition. These markers could significantly reduce the size of trials to screen treatments for efficacy in SVD, although further validation from longitudinal and intervention studies is required.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom