English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Arterial spin labeling (ASL) and dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are widely used to image cerebral blood flow (CBF) in stroke. This study examined how changes in tissue spin-lattice relaxation-time constant (T(1)), blood-brain barrier (BBB) permeability, and transit time affect CBF quantification by ASL and DSC in postischemic hyperperfusion in the same animals. In Group I (n=6), embolic stroke rats imaged 48 hours after stroke showed regional hyperperfusion. In normal pixels, ASL- and DSC-CBF linearly correlated pixel-by-pixel. In hyperperfusion pixels, ASL-CBF was significantly higher than DSC-CBF pixel-by-pixel (by 25%). T(1) increased from 1.76±0.14 seconds in normal pixels to 1.93±0.17 seconds in hyperperfusion pixels. Arterial transit time decreased from 300 milliseconds in normal pixels to 200 milliseconds in hyperperfusion pixels. ΔR(2)(*) profiles showed contrast-agent leakages in the hyperperfusion regions. In Group II (n=3) in which hypercapnic inhalation was used to increase CBF without BBB disruption, CBF increased overall but ASL- and DSC-CBF remained linearly correlated. In Group III (n=3) in which mannitol was used to break the BBB, ASL-CBF was significantly higher than DSC-CBF. We concluded that in normal tissue, ASL and DSC provide comparable quantitative CBF, whereas in postischemic hyperperfusion, ASL-CBF and DSC-CBF differed significantly because ischemia-induced changes in T(1) and BBB permeability affected the two methods differently.

Arterial spin labeling and dynamic susceptibility contrast CBF MRI in postischemic hyperperfusion, hypercapnia, and after mannitol injection