z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Precision and Accuracy Considerations of Physiological Quantitation in PET
Author(s) -
Richard E. Carson
Publication year - 1991
Publication title -
journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.167
H-Index - 193
eISSN - 1559-7016
pISSN - 0271-678X
DOI - 10.1038/jcbfm.1991.36
Subject(s) - normalization (sociology) , computer science , sensitivity (control systems) , noise (video) , variance (accounting) , statistics , biological system , pattern recognition (psychology) , artificial intelligence , econometrics , mathematics , biology , electronic engineering , sociology , anthropology , engineering , image (mathematics) , accounting , business
The ability to differentiate regional patterns of flow and metabolism between various patient populations depends upon the signal-to-noise characteristics of the data. The approach chosen for producing quantitative data will affect the detection sensitivity of a method. Methods based on mathematical models can reduce intersubject variability by accounting for factors unrelated to the physiological measure of interest, in particular, differences in the input function. However, errors in the model and in the implementation of a model-based method can increase variability compared to simpler, empirical methods. Normalization of physiological measures can significantly reduce intersubject variation; however, interpretation of normalized results can be more complex. The advantages and disadvantages of various approaches for physiological quantitation are considered.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom