z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Task constraints act at the level of synergies and at the level of end-effector kinematics in manual reaching and manual lateral interception.
Author(s) -
Inge Tuitert,
Laura Golenia,
Egbert Otten,
Reinoud J. Bootsma,
Raoul M. Bongers
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
journal of experimental psychology human perception and performance
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.691
H-Index - 148
eISSN - 1939-1277
pISSN - 0096-1523
DOI - 10.1037/xhp0000861
Subject(s) - kinematics , interception , task (project management) , robot end effector , computer science , process (computing) , simulation , control theory (sociology) , physical medicine and rehabilitation , artificial intelligence , engineering , biology , ecology , robot , control (management) , physics , systems engineering , medicine , classical mechanics , operating system
To coordinate the redundant degrees of freedom (DOF) in the action system, synergies are often proposed. Synergies organize DOF in temporary task-specific units emerging from interactions among task, organism, and environmental constraints. We examined whether task constraints affect synergies, end-effector kinematics, or both. To this end, we compared synergies and end-effector kinematics when participants ( N = 15) performed discrete movements of identical amplitude in manual reaching (stationary targets) and manual lateral interception (moving targets, with different angles of approach). We found that time-velocity profiles were roughly symmetric in reaching, whereas they had a longer decelerative tail and showed an angle-of-approach effect in interception. Uncontrolled manifold analyses showed that in all conditions joint angle variability was primarily covariation, indicating a synergistic organization. The analysis on the clusters of joint angle configurations demonstrated differences between reaching and interception synergies, whereas more similar synergies were used within interception conditions. This implies that some task constraints operate at the level of synergies while other task constraints only affect end-effector kinematics. The results support a 2-step process in the organization of DOF, consisting of synergy formation and further constraining of synergies to produce the actual movement, as proposed by Kay (1988). (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom